Wednesday 17 march 2010
3
17
/03
/Mar
/2010
14:01
-
Posted in: 2009-2010 - Tale STG
Hey,
today we first commented on a very violent British anti-tobacco campaign.
You can watch it here again:
Here is what we said about it:
The document is a video / an advertisement.
It represents the dangers / risks of smoking.
There is a man who is walking in the street.
He is bleeding / There is a lot of blood.
It's a shocking document; the scene is gruesome / very violent.
According to me, cigarettes are not that dangerous.
It's exaggerated. It's not efficient.
However, according to Nadia, cigarettes are highly / very dangerous, they destroy the
body like we see in the ad. It's like the ad with crashed cars.
To conclude, I don't believe it will make me change my behaviour /
attitude. We can say that shocking people may work sometimes but I think that sensitizing them and helping them is better.
Then we started our new sequence with the short description and oral presentation of this picture:

Here is what we said about it:
It's an advertisement which depicts / shows a young boy, a teenager.
He looks rebellious.
He is looking / staring directly at the camera.
He looks / seems defiant.
He is wearing "rock clothes", a leather jacket and he has long hair.
Rock is a symbol for rebellion.
However appearances are deceptive.
He may not be violent or rebellious, he may not be an anarchist [k] but he has the looks.
HW : don't forget that next week, you will have to comment on the new French anti-smoking advertisement campaign. You will also have a written
expression test. If you want to get ready, have a look at p. 119 in your textbooks.
By English Prof
2
It represents the dangers of smoking.
There is a man who is walking in the street.
He is bleeding.
There is a lot of blood.
It's a shocking document the scene is gruesome/very violent.
According to me, cigarettes are not that dangerous.
It's exaggerated.
It's not efficient.
However, according to Nadia, cigarettes are highly dangerous, they destroy the body like very.
We see in the ad.
It's like the ad with crashed cars. I don't believe it will make me change my behaviour/attitude.
CCL : To conclude, we can say that shoking people may work sometimes but I think that sensitizing them and helping is better.
Don't forget to update all the posts that still bear your name Mélania.
It represents the dangers of smoking.
There is a man who is walking in the street.
He bleeding.
There is a lot of blood.
It's a shocking doc the scene is gruesome/ very violent.
According to me, cigarettes are not that dangerous.
It's exaggerated.
It's not efficient.
However, according to Nadia, cigarettes are highly dangerous, they destroy the body like very.
We see in the ad.
It's like the ad with crashed cars.
Idon't believe it will make me change my behaviour/attitude.
CCL : To conclude, we can say that shocking people may work sometimes but I think that sensitizing them and helping is better.
It's an advertissement which dispicts/shows a young boy, a teenager.
He looks rebellions.
He is looking/ staring directly at the camera.
He looks/seems defiant.
He is wearing "rock clothes", a leather jacket and he has long hair.
Rock is a sumbol for rebellio,.
However apparances are deceptive.
He may not be violent or rebellions, he may not be an anarchist but he has the looks.
You can correct your copybook because there are some typos in what you wrote.
Take care,
M. Hattais.